paper:watson-2010-associativeAssociative memory in gene regulation networks
Original abstract (expand)
The pattern of gene expression in the phenotype of an organism is determined in part by the dynamical attractors of the organism’s gene regulation network. Changes to the connections in this network over evolutionary time alter the adult gene expression pattern and hence the fitness of the organism. However, the evolution of structure in gene expression networks (potentially reflecting past selective environments) and its affordances and limitations with respect to enhancing evolvability is poorly understood in general. In this paper we model the evolution of a gene regulation network in a controlled scenario. We show that selected changes to connections in the regulation network make the currently selected gene expression pattern more robust to environmental variation. Moreover, such changes to connections are necessarily ‘Hebbian’ – ‘genes that fire together wire together’ – i.e. genes whose expression is selected for in the same selective environments become co-regulated. Accordingly, in a manner formally equivalent to well-understood learning behaviour in artificial neural networks, a gene expression network will therefore develop a generalised associative memory of past selected phenotypes. This theoretical framework helps us to better understand the relationship between homeostasis and evolvability (i.e. selection to reduce variability facilitates structured variability), and shows that, in principle, a gene regulation network has the potential to develop ‘recall’ capabilities normally reserved for cognitive systems.
Related work— refs + corpus + external arXiv
Cited / in-corpus / arXiv badges show which signals surfaced each row. Multi-source rows weighted higher.
- Adaptive walks in a gene network model of morphogenesis: insights into the Cambrian explosionPau Fernandez, Stuart A. Kauffman Ricard V. Sole2007≈ 72%
- Revolutionizing Genomics with Reinforcement Learning TechniquesKhadijeh (Hoda) Jahanian, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Iman Dehzangi, Juan M Gorriz, Yudong Zhang, Jia Wang, Farshid Hajati, Min Yang, Thantrira Porntaveetus, Hamid Alinejad-Rokny Mohsen Karami2026≈ 72%
- Chaotic Oscillatory Associative MemoryV. Srinivasa Chakravarthy, Sayan Gupta Nurani Rajagopal Rohan2026≈ 71%
- Emergent thresholds in genetic regulatory networks: Protein patterning in Drosophila morphogenesisDaniele Muraro Rui Dil\~ao2009≈ 70%
- ≈ 70%
- Neural cellular automata: applications to biology and beyond classical AIMichael Levin, L\'eo Pio-Lopez Benedikt Hartl2025≈ 69%
- Evolution-Development Congruence in Pattern Formation Dynamics: Bifurcations in Gene Expressions and Regulation of Networks StructuresTakahiro Kohsokabe and Kunihiko Kaneko2015≈ 69%
- ≈ 69%
- Towards a Predictive Processing Implementation of the Common Model of CognitionM. A. Kelly Alexander Ororbia2021≈ 69%
- General Mechanism of Evolution Shared by Proteins and WordsHsing-Yi Lai, Sun-Ting Tsai, Chen Siang Ng, Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma, Shan-Jyun Wu, Meng-Xue Tsai, Yi-Ching Su, Daw-Wei Wang, and Tzay-Ming Hong Li-Min Wang2026≈ 69%
- Interoceptive machine framework: Toward interoception-inspired regulatory architectures in artificial intelligenceDiego Candia-Rivera (NERV)2026≈ 68%
- Improved Learning in Evolution Strategies via Sparser Inter-Agent Network TopologiesDan Calacci, Yan Leng, Peter Krafft, Esteban Moro, Alex Pentland Dhaval Adjodah2019≈ 68%
- Generative artificial intelligence-enabled dynamic detection of nicotine-related circuitsChanghong Jing, Ye Li, Xinan Liu, Zuxin Chen, Shuqiang Wang Changwei Gong2022≈ 68%
- Learning Developmental Scaffoldings to Guide Self-OrganisationMilton L. Montero and Elias Najarro and Jakob Schauser and Sebastian Risi2026≈ 68%
- Artificial Theory of Mind and Self-Guided Social OrganisationJaime Ruiz-Serra, Catherine Drysdale Michael S. Harr\'e2024≈ 68%
- Learning without neurons in physical systemsin corpus2022≈ 66%
- Collective intelligence: A unifying concept for integrating biology across scales and substratesin corpus2024≈ 66%
- The biogenic approach to cognitionin corpus2005≈ 66%
- ≈ 66%
- Model Alignment Searchin corpus2025≈ 65%
- Finding Alignments Between Interpretable Causal Variables and Distributed Neural Representationsin corpus2023≈ 65%
- Darwin's agential materials: evolutionary implications of multiscale competency in developmental biologyin corpus2023≈ 65%
- ≈ 65%
- ≈ 65%
- Self-Improvising Memory: A Perspective on Memories as Agential, Dynamically Reinterpreting Cognitive Gluein corpus2024≈ 64%
- Covariance-based Sequence Poolingin corpus2026≈ 64%
- Cognitive glues are shared models of relative scarcities: the economics of collective intelligencein corpus2026≈ 64%
- ≈ 64%
Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar
Cited by (5)
- Developmental Bioelectricity: the cognitive glue enabling evolutionary scaling from physiology to mind
Developmental bioelectricity—the network of ion channels, gap junctions, and neurotransmitter-mediated Vmem (membrane potential) dynamics operating across all body cells, not just neurons—functions as
- Design for an Individual: Connectionist Approaches to the Evolutionary Transitions in Individuality
Evolutionary transitions in individuality (ETIs) require interaction structures among lower-level units that compute non-linearly separable functions — the same class of functions that single-layer Pe
- Endless forms most beautiful 2.0: teleonomy and the bioengineering of chimaeric and synthetic organisms
Cellular collectives exhibit goal-directed competency that is substrate-independent, composition-independent, and origin-independent — a property Clawson and Levin term teleonomy — and this invariant,
- Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere: An Experimentally-Grounded Framework for Understanding Diverse Bodies and Minds
TAME—Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere—formalizes a non-binary, empirically grounded framework for recognizing, comparing, and manipulating cognition across radically diverse substrates, from
- Generalizing frameworks for sentience beyond natural species
Criteria anchored to vertebrate neuroanatomy and verbal behavior — exemplified by the Smith & Boyd (1991) framework and the Turing Test — are structurally inadequate for the full space of possible sen