paper:doi-10-1016-j-pneurobio-2017-05-004Uncertainty and stress: Why it causes diseases and how it is mastered by the brain
Original abstract (expand)
The term 'stress' - coined in 1936 - has many definitions, but until now has lacked a theoretical foundation. Here we present an information-theoretic approach - based on the 'free energy principle' - defining the essence of stress; namely, uncertainty. We address three questions: What is uncertainty? What does it do to us? What are our resources to master it? Mathematically speaking, uncertainty is entropy or 'expected surprise'. The 'free energy principle' rests upon the fact that self-organizing biological agents resist a tendency to disorder and must therefore minimize the entropy of their sensory states. Applied to our everyday life, this means that we feel uncertain, when we anticipate that outcomes will turn out to be something other than expected - and that we are unable to avoid surprise. As all cognitive systems strive to reduce their uncertainty about future outcomes, they face a critical constraint: Reducing uncertainty requires cerebral energy. The characteristic of the vertebrate brain to prioritize its own high energy is captured by the notion of the 'selfish brain'. Accordingly, in times of uncertainty, the selfish brain demands extra energy from the body. If, despite all this, the brain cannot reduce uncertainty, a persistent cerebral energy crisis may develop, burdening the individual by 'allostatic load' that contributes to systemic and brain malfunction (impaired memory, atherogenesis, diabetes and subsequent cardio- and cerebrovascular events). Based on the basic tenet that stress originates from uncertainty, we discuss the strategies our brain uses to avoid surprise and thereby resolve uncertainty.
Related work— refs + corpus + external arXiv
Cited / in-corpus / arXiv badges show which signals surfaced each row. Multi-source rows weighted higher.
- The grip of grammar on meaning uncertainty: cross-linguistic evidence, neural correlates, and clinical relevanceClaudio Palominos, Samuele Vallisa, Ni Yang, Han Zhang, Miguel \'Angel Santos Santos, Neguine Rezaii, Sergi Valero, Yonghua Huang, Huan Li, Hong Jiang, Yongjun Peng, Maria Francisca Alonso-S\'anchez, Frederike Stein, Tilo Kircher, Philipp Homan, Iris Sommer, Lena Palaniyappan, Wolfram Hinzen Rui He2026≈ 72%
- Future of Brain Health: From Developmental Insights to Clinical TranslationMartin G Frasch, Eduardo T C\'anepa, Gerlinde A.S. Metz, Marta Cristina Antonelli, Sheehan D. Fisher and Bea R.H. Van den Bergh Mariela Chertoff2025≈ 72%
- ≈ 71%
- Explaining intuitive difficulty judgments by modeling physical effort and riskBasil Saeed, Grace Bennett-Pierre, Tobias Gerstenberg, Joshua Tenenbaum, Hyowon Gweon Ilker Yildirim2019≈ 70%
- Perceptions of Linguistic Uncertainty by Language Models and HumansMarkelle Kelly, Mark Steyvers, Sameer Singh, Padhraic Smyth Catarina G Belem2024≈ 70%
- ≈ 70%
- The Role of Affective States in Computational PsychiatryRyan Smith, Andreea O. Diaconescu, Timothy Friesen, Sara Jalali, Nace Mikus, Laura Gschwandtner, Jay Gandhi, Guillermo Horga, Albert Powers David Benrimoh2025≈ 70%
- ≈ 70%
- A Survey of Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Evaluations, Representations, and Safety RisksHieu Minh "Jord" Nguyen2025≈ 70%
- ≈ 70%
- ≈ 70%
- How causal analysis can reveal autonomy in models of biological systemsHyunju Kim, Sara I. Walker, Giulio Tononi and Larissa Albantakis William Marshall2018≈ 70%
- ≈ 70%
- Evaluating Theory of (an uncertain) Mind: Predicting the Uncertain Beliefs of Others in Conversation ForecastingAnthony Sicilia and Malihe Alikhani2024≈ 70%
- Surprise! Using Physiological Stress for Allostatic Regulation Under the Active Inference Framework [Pre-Print]Imran Khan and Robert Lowe2024≈ 69%
- ≈ 69%
- The scaling of goals via homeostasis: an evolutionary simulation, experiment and analysisJohanna Bischof, Jennifer V. LaPalme, and Michael Levin Leo Pio-Lopez2022≈ 69%
- ≈ 68%
- ≈ 68%
- ≈ 68%
- Emergence and Causality in Complex Systems: A Survey on Causal Emergence and Related Quantitative Studiesin corpus2023≈ 68%
- Why Learning Requires Feelingin corpus2026≈ 67%
- Self-Improvising Memory: A Perspective on Memories as Agential, Dynamically Reinterpreting Cognitive Gluein corpus2024≈ 67%
- ≈ 67%
- ≈ 67%
- ≈ 66%
- ≈ 66%
- ≈ 65%
- The computational boundary of a 'self': developmental bioelectricity drives multicellularity and scale-free cognitionin corpus2019≈ 65%
- The biogenic approach to cognitionin corpus2005≈ 65%
Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar
Cited by (4)
- Stress sharing as cognitive glue for collective intelligences: A computational model of stress as a coordinator for morphogenesis
Stress sharing between cells accelerates collective morphogenesis and expands individual cells' cognitive light cone, as demonstrated in a multiscale agent-based computational model of embryogenesis p
- Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere: An Experimentally-Grounded Framework for Understanding Diverse Bodies and Minds
TAME—Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere—formalizes a non-binary, empirically grounded framework for recognizing, comparing, and manipulating cognition across radically diverse substrates, from
- Collective intelligence: A unifying concept for integrating biology across scales and substrates
Collective intelligence, understood as William James' capacity to reach the same goal by different means, operates not only in beehives and ant colonies but as a scale-free organizing principle across
- The computational boundary of a 'self': developmental bioelectricity drives multicellularity and scale-free cognition
Scale-Free Cognition, the framework introduced here, proposes that any coherent Self is demarcated by a 'cognitive light cone'—a spatio-temporal boundary of events a system can measure, model, and att