method
active
method:irony-comprehension-task

Irony Comprehension Task

ToM task requiring integration of intent and tone to understand sarcasm; scored 0/1.

Related by similarity (8)

cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edge

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

  • Set of 50 paradoxical prompts used in Experiment 4 to test whether self-referential state transfers to an unrelated behavioral domain
  • Hinting Taskmethod0.746
    One of four ToM tasks analyzed; requires inferring speaker intent from indirect hints; scored 0/1.
  • Training paradigm requiring prediction of upcoming sensory observations during spatial navigation across multiple environments sharing the same structure.
  • Novel task asking which of two sentences received a stronger injection, using matched-pairs design to control for positional bias
  • Experimental paradigm where the model is told about the possibility of thought injection and asked to report detection and identification.
  • Task Difficultyconcept0.721
    The paper identifies task difficulty as a key moderator: easy MMLU questions show performative CoT, hard GPQA-Diamond questions show genuine reasoning
  • Task where the model must simultaneously identify an injected thought and transcribe a text sentence.
  • Language model reasoning tasks with sequential geometry used in experiments.