method
active
method:strength-comparison-taskStrength Comparison Task
Novel task asking which of two sentences received a stronger injection, using matched-pairs design to control for positional bias
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Concepts (1)
concept
- global logit shiftassociated_withThe methodological confound identified by this paper: injection biases model toward 'YES' for any binary question regardless of content
Methods (1)
method
- Experimental design where injection strengths are swapped between sentences in two parts of each trial to cancel positional preferences
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- The paper identifies task difficulty as a key moderator: easy MMLU questions show performative CoT, hard GPQA-Diamond questions show genuine reasoning
- The problem of ensuring all tasks in MTL perform well, avoiding dominance by some tasks.
- Experimental protocol asking observers to compare two systems A and B for degree of life; used to establish objectivity through inter-observer convergence
- The more general, daily-use version of the mirror-of-self test: asking which of A or B induces greater feeling of wholeness in the observer
- The problematic possibility of digital minds with superhumanly strong preferences requiring interpersonal utility comparison frameworks
- Parameters controlling the influence of conditioning signals in the generative process.
- Coefficient weighting each task loss in the MTL objective.
- Spearman ρ measuring rank-order agreement between logit-based self-report and probe score; the paper's primary monotonic association metric