The framework's methodological contributions could be adapted to target arbitrary non-psychological attributes given custom evaluation criteria

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Contingent properties like composition, origin, or similarity to human brains should not define ethical consideration for novel agents.claim0.765
  Ethics must be based on empirically-determined cognitive properties (goals, preferences, concerns) rather than parochial markers.
• Quantitative criteria like those of Crump et al. are a good example of the kind of framework we need: explicitly laying out conditions in a way that reveals their value and limitations.claim0.763
  Praise for the target framework's transparency.
• What Novel Ethical Frameworks Are Needed For Relatingquestion0.760
• The psychological steering framework generalizes beyond OCEAN to Dark Tetrad, CMNI, CFNI, and other psychological modelsclaim0.757
  Supported by qualitative experiments showing fluent and coherent steering for three additional models
• Sentience assessment should seek deep invariants across possible minds, not arbitrary criteria tied to evolution on Earthclaim0.757
  Core normative claim: frameworks must identify fundamental properties of sentience independent of phylogenetic accident or familiar substrates.
• What frameworks can identify sentience in radically unfamiliar agents without familiar touchstones of evolution or anatomy?question0.753
  Central question driving the paper; necessitated by imminent proliferation of cyborgs, synthetic organisms, and AI.
• The marker method can be adapted for AI systems by focusing less on behavioral evidence and more on architectural evidence.claim0.753
  Proposal for assessment framework.
• If a specific framing, which uses tools normally reserved for brains, results in fruitful new research programs on unconventional systems, then the scientific approach requires that we consider those systems to be bona fide subjects of that corner of the natural world.hypothesis0.752
  Methodological hypothesis from Box 1: the pragmatic test for extending cognitive terminology.