framework
active
framework:utilitarian-theoryUtilitarian Theory
The primary ethical framework under which super-beneficiaries generate dominant resource claims
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Concepts (1)
concept
- Super-Beneficiaryassociated_withA being that is superhumanly efficient at deriving well-being from resources; the paper's central analytical category
Claims (1)
claim
- Key argument that digital super-beneficiaries present a challenge across ethical theories, not only for utilitarianism
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Ethical theory emphasizing beneficence for sentient beings; contrasted with Kantianism.
- Nozick's formulation of the utility monster problem, the foundational thought experiment for the paper
- Framework treating phenomena as information flows and exchanges; adopted by Friedman and others to model design as informational process.
- The class of explanations from the Santa Fe Institute tradition, including attractor dynamics and emergent order, evaluated as insufficient to fully explain the appearance of living structure
- Design of controllers to minimize a cost function.
- The standard evolutionary framework based on selective advantage of step-wise mutations, which Alexander argues is insufficient alone to explain global geometric order in organisms
- Fundamental mathematical tool; poset-as-category provides simple instances of categorical notions like products and adjunctions.
- Economic framework for decision-making under risk.