Social Evolution Theory (Inclusive Fitness)

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Social Evolution Theory and Kin Selectionframework0.838
  Existing approach that uses genetic relatedness to explain cooperation; criticized as insufficient for explaining all ETIs.
• Evolutionary Game Theoryframework0.767
  Framework for analyzing interactions between autonomous evolutionary units showing fitness effect sign reversals.
• Inclusive Fitness Frameworkframework0.764
• Darwinian Theory of Evolutionframework0.763
  The standard evolutionary framework based on selective advantage of step-wise mutations, which Alexander argues is insufficient alone to explain global geometric order in organisms
• For collectives to be meaningful evolutionary units, fitness interactions must be non-linearly separable, not merely non-aggregative.claim0.746
  Strengthens distinction between monotonic non-linear interactions (explanatorily redundant) and non-decomposable interactions (causally significant).
• Selection (Darwinian)concept0.736
  The stage in the genetic algorithm where top 10% embryos by phenotypic fitness are selected.
• Major Evolutionary Transitions Theoryframework0.736
  The theory that new levels of biological organization arise when independent replicators cooperate to form higher-level entities (Szathmáry, Maynard Smith).
• The kind of relationships necessary to produce evolutionary individuality – the generation and heritability of fitness differences at the collective level – are the same as those required to produce organismic individuality – the information integration and collective action characteristic of a self.claim0.735
  Core conjecture linking evolutionary and organismic individuality.