framework
active
framework:emptiness-realisation-modelEmptiness Realisation Model
The paper's primary contribution: formalising Buddhist awakening as BMR of the separation prior sigma
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Frameworks (3)
framework
- Active InferenceusesFoundational framework by Karl Friston; the paper extends it to three hierarchical levels for modeling meta-awareness.
- Quantum Free Energy Principle (qFEP)implementsReformulation of FEP in quantum information theory terms; the primary formal apparatus of the paper
- Formal mechanism by which the separation prior sigma is pruned from the generative model
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- The stable experiential recognition of emptiness; the paper frames it as embodied recognition of the impossibility of self-evidence.
- Pre-empts the objection that emptiness realisation dissolves the agent's ability to model reality
- The paper argues for a mathematical link.
- Addressed in §5 via structural realism and the distinction between losing an ontological commitment vs losing a capability
- Key theoretical bridge connecting Buddhist emptiness doctrine to computational neuroscience
- Empirical prediction from the model: brain dynamics change after the transition.
- Buddhist philosophical framework in which emptiness (śūnyatā) refers to the lack of inherent self-nature; here linked to the non-evidenceability of a bounded self.
- Novel claim that emptiness is not mysterious metaphysics for AI but a computational commonplace