Crump et al. (2022) Sentience in decapod crustaceans

Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count

thinker

claim

Verbal reports, homology, and phylogenetic provenance are insufficient to determine sentience in unconventional agents.
extends
Core claim: Turing test and brain homology fail for synthetic, AI, and radically non-human agents; new frameworks required.

framework

Crump et al. Decapod Sentience Framework
related_to
A set of eight criteria for assessing sentience in decapod crustaceans, proposed by Crump et al. (2022).
Eight criteria for sentience: nociception, sensory integration, integrated nociception, analgesia, motivational trade-offs, flexible self-protection, associative learning, analgesia preference
introduces
Quantitative, operationalizable criteria proposed by Crump et al. that Levin argues can be generalized beyond natural species.

hypothesis

question

cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edge

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

Crump et al. eight criteria for sentiencemethod0.822
Set of eight criteria: nociception, sensory integration, integrated nociception, analgesia, motivational trade-offs, flexible self-protection, associative learning, analgesia preference.
Crump Et Als Eight Criteria For Sentienceframework0.816
Crump Et Al Sentience Criteriaframework0.814
Eight Sentience Criteria (Crump et al.)framework0.793
Quantitative, flexible framework for assessing sentience: nociception, sensory integration, analgesia, trade-offs, self-protection, learning, preference.
Crump et al. (2022) offer a well-argued example of an essential development: a rigorous framework for assessing sentience from the perspective of moral concern over an agent's welfare.claim0.771
Levin's endorsement of the target paper's contribution.
Plant sentience is likely to be the tip of the iceberg of sentient systems yet unknown.concept0.749
Load-bearing concluding statement about the broader implications of substrate-independent sentience.
That animal sentience is inferred on the basis of some likeness to humans is ultimately an intuition.claim0.739
Claim that the basis for inferring animal sentience is intuitive, not empirical.
Although none of these behaviours necessarily require sentience, they are often proposed as evidence of animal sentience because of their subjective correlates in humans.claim0.733
Acknowledgment that the same behaviours are used to infer sentience in animals despite not proving it.