finding
active
finding:the-total-hamiltonian-h-u-is-equally-consistent-with-any-factorisation-of-the-hilbert-space-so-nothing-about-the-physics-privileges-any-one-boundary-placement-zanardi-2002The total Hamiltonian H_U is equally consistent with any factorisation of the Hilbert space, so nothing about the physics privileges any one boundary placement (Zanardi 2002)
Establishes that the boundary is a modelling choice not determined by the underlying physics
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Lars Sandved-Smith · Chris Fields · Thomas Doctor · Ruben Laukkonen +1
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Established via Zanardi (2002) and the Hamiltonian decomposition argument in §2.1; foundational for the emptiness formalisation
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- A unique local Hamiltonian with window length ω can be associated to any AR(ω) model (Theorem 3)finding0.748Mapping autoregressive models to spin systems
- Evolution pivoted the same problem-solving strategies across different domains.
- Topological equivalence theorem for local Hamiltonians
- Parallel between the role of wholeness in physics and architecture.
- No ordered phase in 1D with multiple stored patterns
- Extends the scope of wholeness to quantum mechanics, interpreting the two-slit experiment through centers.
- Demonstrates that optimal modelling erodes the very separability condition that defines a bounded agent