The FEP is asymptotically equivalent to the Principle of Unitarity: as prediction error approaches zero, A and B would need to share identical reference frames, which requires entanglement rather than separability (Fields et al. 2022)

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Exact repetition flies in the face of the fundamental principle of unfolding.claim0.776
  Critique of modern structural repetition as contradictory to the idea that each part should be unique.
• If new predictions about physical processes were to follow from the principle of unfolding wholeness, it may be a deeper and more significant autonomous principle rather than merely a redescription of known results.hypothesis0.757
  Alexander's conditional about the epistemic status of his proposed principle
• The discovery of perfect abstract equality representations that cannot be decomposed into entity representations is a foundational result informing our understanding of how symbolic and connectionist architectures coexistclaim0.752
  Concluding claim about theoretical significance of the hierarchical equality finding.
• Any system that persists must minimise surprisal, thereby gathering evidence for its own generative model, a process known as self-evidencing.claim0.749
  Foundational claim of the paper, defining self-evidencing.
• Bayes-optimal perception inherently produces self-organised instability (local Lyapunov exponents fluctuating around zero), so FEP drives the system toward criticality (Friston et al. 2012)finding0.748
  Establishes the mechanistic link between lower VFE and critical dynamics, supporting the paper's criticality prediction
• Coherence maximization across simultaneously active mental models is related to prediction error minimization in the FEP, but the relationship is one of compatibility rather than strict equivalenceclaim0.747
  CIMC's position on the relationship between its coherence hypothesis and Friston's FEP
• The principle of unfolding wholeness is purely geometrical in character, not arithmetical and not energy-based, distinguishing it fundamentally from least action.claim0.741
  Alexander's characterization of what makes his principle novel relative to least-action formulations
• Functional and phenomenal introspection are distinguishable, and whether they correlate in machines is an open question.claim0.740
  Core conceptual distinction introduced at the start; defines the paper's central problem.