finding
active
finding:table-4-at-20-units-acre-pedestrians-drop-to-7-gardens-33-buildings-32-cars-28Table 4: At 20 units/acre: Pedestrians drop to 7%, Gardens 33%, Buildings 32%, Cars 28%
Demonstrates how a 12% density increase (from 16 to 20 units/acre) causes dramatic pedestrian space loss.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- The central density threshold claim derived from the interaction of the four colors.
Chapters (1)
chapter
- Chapter 9: The Way That Living Processes Can Guide The Reconstruction Of An Urban NeighborhoodintroducesThe working unit that describes the four-fold pattern process for transforming blighted neighborhoods into living structures.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Table 3: Progresso percentages at 16 units/acre: Pedestrians 17%, Gardens 30%, Buildings 28%, Cars 25%finding0.894Specific target percentages for the Progresso neighborhood at the upper limit of humane density.
- Claim that the many-parallel-lanes configuration adapts well to slightly lower densities.
- Calculated overall floor-area ratio for the humane density threshold.
- The upper limit of density for a humane neighborhood, above which pedestrian space is sacrificed destructively.
- Central feasibility claim of the chapter.
- Estimate based on labor hours and physical pieces; used to motivate economic cost analysis.
- Stress-sharing enables cell movement over longer distances (~2500 units vs ~200 units without sharing).finding0.694Stress-sharing cells moved average Euclidean distance of ~2500 units, vs ~200 units in non-sharing populations.
- The prescription that about 20% of a building project's construction budget must be spent on outdoor structures (terraces, walls, paths, etc.) to make the whole living.