It is possible to provide a high-density living environment with these qualities while housing 80 families per acre.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• A density of 16 dwellings (or units) per acre is roughly the upper limit of what can be achieved while keeping the environment humane.claim0.865
  The central density threshold claim derived from the interaction of the four colors.
• At 40-80 families per acre, the same geometry gives larger gardens, and there is no need for underground parking.claim0.780
  Claim that the many-parallel-lanes configuration adapts well to slightly lower densities.
• If the neighborhood could achieve a 2.5-fold or 3-fold increase of density, they could have a vibrant living neighborhood.hypothesis0.772
  Conditional prediction that moderate density increase enables economic and social revival.
• In conventional high-rise housing at 200/ha, not one family has their own garden; in Shiratori every family does.claim0.765
  Comparative claim about equitable access to private outdoor space.
• Density threshold (16 units/acre)concept0.754
  The upper limit of density for a humane neighborhood, above which pedestrian space is sacrificed destructively.
• Modern forms of high-density housing have unnecessarily gone in a direction which is inhumane, inefficient, expensive, and unpleasant.claim0.752
  Critical diagnosis of the status quo.
• An ordinary American house contains a density of about 1 decision per cubic foot, thus about 20,000 possible mistakes when the house is not generated.claim0.744
  Estimate based on labor hours and physical pieces; used to motivate economic cost analysis.
• The general morphological features for very high densities from a living process are: low height, abundant daylight, tiny gardens, narrow lanes, parking partly underground, and family-designed interiors.claim0.737
  Summary invariant of housing forms generated by the living process at high density.