claim
active
claim:in-conventional-high-rise-housing-at-200-ha-not-one-family-has-their-own-garden-in-shiratori-every-family-doesIn conventional high-rise housing at 200/ha, not one family has their own garden; in Shiratori every family does.
Comparative claim about equitable access to private outdoor space.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Findings (1)
finding
- Answer to Question 1 of the 11-question survey.
Questions (1)
question
- Rhetorical question highlighting the superiority of the Shiratori plan over conventional high-rise.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Shiratori apartment has 24 linear meters of daylight-facing wall vs 6 m in typical high-risefinding0.805Daylight performance comparison based on apartment geometry.
- Shiratori apartments get more than twice as much sunlight as typical high-rise apartments.claim0.794Performance claim based on square-meter hour measurements.
- 100% of floor area in Shiratori apartment within 3 m of a window vs ~25% in typical high-risefinding0.793Daylight coverage comparison.
- Economic feasibility claim countering common assumptions.
- Claim that the many-parallel-lanes configuration adapts well to slightly lower densities.
- Initial question posed to residents in the survey.
- On December 21, Shiratori apartment receives 150 square-meter hours of sunlight vs 70 in typical high-risefinding0.767Sunlight comparison on shortest day, demonstrating more than double exposure.
- Central feasibility claim of the chapter.