Incongruent Stroop stimuli act as negative-valence primes, shifting subsequent evaluations in a negative direction

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Probes trained under different explicit instruction prompts (ask-correct, ask-t/f, ask-able, ask-arith) are highly aligned with each other in cosine similarity.finding0.749
  Shows the passive vs. active divide is more important than the specific wording of instructions.
• Results may not fully generalize to all models and scenarios because the model organism relies on hints and nudges and Llama Nemotron cannot consistently distinguish evaluation/deployment based on subtle cuesclaim0.745
  Key limitation acknowledged by authors.
• A question anywhere along the line that elicits a premature attempt at an answer could neutralize the remainder of the process into rationalization.hypothesis0.735
  About chain-of-thought and process safety.
• The results generalise readily to non-equilibrium systems where scaling relationships remain similar (e.g., dynamic or localised scaling).claim0.734
  Claim about broader applicability of the scaling argument
• A probe may achieve high performance even on representations that are not causally relevant for the taskclaim0.733
  Key interpretive claim from Case Study II distinguishing probe accuracy from causal relevance
• Juxtaposition pretends to parity.claim0.732
  Reveals the illusion of equality when elements sit side by side.
• When interactions constitute non-linearly separable functions, it creates a ‘we’; what we are doing becomes a relevant variable.claim0.731
  Explains how non-separability shifts identity from parts to collective.
• When direction of selection on particle character depends on context (other particles), particle character does not determine its own fitness; the collective is not redundantclaim0.731
  Formal condition for meaningful higher-level individual