Cross-domain anchoring

Observation that anchoring effects appear across text and vision modalities.

Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count

claim

concept

semantic anchoring
associated_with
The central idea that external structure binds latent patterns to desired targets.
hysteresis-like asymmetry
associated_with
Asymmetric cross-base transfer after fine-tuning, with higher-density priors more robust.

artifact

cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edge

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

E1: Cross-Domain Anchoring Demonstrationsmethod0.856
Qualitative experiment showing coherent anchors can rebind strong priors across text and vision modalities
Cross-domain anchoring demonstrates that UCCT's principles apply beyond textclaim0.823
Claim of modality generality
anchorconcept0.760
External structure (in-context examples, retrieval, tuning) that biases latent pattern activation.
anchoring strength Sconcept0.714
Composite score S = ρd − dr − log k predicting anchoring success.
Semantic-anchoring assumptionconcept0.709
Assumption that structured inputs act as anchors biasing activation toward target patterns PT.
cross-base interferenceconcept0.704
Asymmetric transfer after fine-tuning: high-density bases (B10) are more robust.
Cross-Judge Analysismethod0.701
Validation of judge model robustness by regrading 1000 responses with 4 additional judge models
cross-referenceconcept0.699
Explicit textual or graphical links between parts of a work, dynamic and virtual.