Type-centric and selector-centric inheritance are symmetric specializations of the same generic delegation mechanism.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Selector-Centric vs Type-Centric Inheritance Symmetryclaim0.889
  Piumarta argues that delegation can occur along two orthogonal axes (objects vs slot names), revealing a fundamental symmetry between type-centric and selector-centric inheritance most systems ignore.
• The symmetry between type-centric and selector-centric inheritance, described in Section 5, is one example of how different mechanisms are specialisations of a generic mechanism.claim0.887
  Claim that the associative model reveals fundamental symmetries between ostensibly different delegation strategies.
• "Expressing delegation as a pair of β-transformations on keys in an associative memory emphasises a fundamental symmetry of the delegation mechanism that is ignored by most object-oriented programming languages."concept0.757
• The formation of centers is guided by generic patterns which play the role of genes.claim0.715
  Analogy to biology, placing pattern languages as the genetic code for living built environments.
• Delegation mechanismconcept0.707
• MCA generates cryptic variance: many mutations neutralized by developmental regulation persist as a hidden diversity pool exploitable in future environments.claim0.707
  Subclaim.
• Most models focus on market-based or state-enforced redistribution rather than voluntary/community-based wealth-sharing mechanisms that existed in pre-modern societies.claim0.706
  Key finding: contemporary economics literature systematically excludes historical voluntary mechanisms.
• When direction of selection on particle character depends on context (other particles), particle character does not determine its own fitness; the collective is not redundantclaim0.701
  Formal condition for meaningful higher-level individual