The symmetry between type-centric and selector-centric inheritance, described in Section 5, is one example of how different mechanisms are specialisations of a generic mechanism.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Type-centric and selector-centric inheritance are symmetric specializations of the same generic delegation mechanism.claim0.887
• Selector-Centric vs Type-Centric Inheritance Symmetryclaim0.880
  Piumarta argues that delegation can occur along two orthogonal axes (objects vs slot names), revealing a fundamental symmetry between type-centric and selector-centric inheritance most systems ignore.
• The formation of centers is guided by generic patterns which play the role of genes.claim0.767
  Analogy to biology, placing pattern languages as the genetic code for living built environments.
• Symmetry between morphogenesis and cognition was obvious to Turing in 1952concept0.766
• "Expressing delegation as a pair of β-transformations on keys in an associative memory emphasises a fundamental symmetry of the delegation mechanism that is ignored by most object-oriented programming languages."concept0.758
• In buildings, especially, the success of the process will be judged by the extent to which these middle-range entities appear with their own distinct symmetries, with their own definite and distinct force as strong centers.claim0.757
  Proposes middle-range entity quality as the criterion for judging the success of a building process
• The deep symmetry between problem-solving in anatomical, physiological, transcriptional, and 3D spaces drives specific hypotheses.claim0.754
  Evolution pivoted the same problem-solving strategies across different domains.
• MCA generates cryptic variance: many mutations neutralized by developmental regulation persist as a hidden diversity pool exploitable in future environments.claim0.745
  Subclaim.