claim
active
claim:to-have-levels-of-scale-the-jumps-between-different-scales-must-not-be-too-great-a-jump-of-2000-1-is-far-too-great-to-form-a-nice-chain-of-levels-jumps-of-roughly-2-1-to-4-1-are-most-effectiveTo have levels of scale, the jumps between different scales must not be too great; a jump of 2000:1 is far too great to form a nice chain of levels; jumps of roughly 2:1 to 4:1 are most effective
Quantitative constraint on the levels of scale property: centers are most helpful when size ratios are moderate; centers less than one-tenth the size of a larger one are less likely to help it
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Concepts (1)
concept
- Levels of ScaleextendsThe property that living structures contain centers at a beautiful range of sizes at well-marked levels with definite jumps, where each level helps the next; jumps should not be too great (ideally 2:1 to 4:1, less than 10:1)
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Clarification that levels of scale fails when detail is merely present but not doing anything—as in machine-made doors with superficially many panels that have no real life
- Implication of PRH for 'scale is all you need' argument
- Emphasizes the importance of full-scale physical judgment over scaled drawings.
- Summary of the geometric invariants that result from living process in large buildings.
- Implication of PRH: larger models should amplify bias less and hallucinate less if they better model reality
- Claims inevitability of scale differentiation in living structural development