There is no truly monadic, indivisible yet cognitive being.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• "There is no truly monadic, indivisible yet cognitive being: all known minds reside in physical systems composed of components of various complexity and active behavior."concept0.924
• Self Composite Non Monadicconcept0.798
• Intelligence and cognition exist on a continuum; modern bioscience offers no support for clean bright-line distinctions between cognitive and non-cognitive beings.claim0.789
  Anti-essentialism claim: questions like 'is it cognitive?' are scientifically unjustified; modern view must ask 'what kind' and 'how much'.
• All cognitive systems have some degree of consciousness.hypothesis0.775
  Gradualism implies that if brains are conscious, so are other tissues with similar mechanisms.
• "Continuum of cognitive capacities—no binary categories, no bright line separating true cognition from 'just physics.'"quote0.770
  Core tenet of TAME from Table 1; foundational to gradualist approach to cognition across all substrates.
• Each human is a collective intelligence; the parenthetical 'of neurons' can be dropped as a conceptual commitment.claim0.764
• There is no binary distinction between 'true cognition' and 'just physics'—only continuous variation in cognitive capacity.claim0.764
  Core interpretive position of TAME: gradualism replaces categorical thinking about agency and cognition.
• There are no permanent or indivisible agents; the actual nonexistence of singular and enduring individuality must be accounted for in any model of agency.claim0.763
  Fundamental ontological claim underlying the selfless self model.