claim

active

claim:the-view-that-profound-architectural-form-arises-from-sudden-inspired-vision-is-completely-wrong-and-incompatible-with-how-living-structure-is-actually-created-through-slow-successive-transformations

The view that profound architectural form arises from sudden inspired vision is completely wrong and incompatible with how living structure is actually created through slow successive transformations.

Alexander's architectural conclusion from his natural philosophy argument, issued as a definitive critique of modernist design ideology

Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count

Concepts (1)

concept

Unfettered Architect-Creator Vision
contradicts
The dominant post-1600 notion that great architecture arises from sudden inspired vision; Alexander argues this is completely wrong given the nature of living structure creation

Claims (1)

claim

Human beings can violate the tendency to preserve wholeness either by acting disrespectfully toward it or by failing to perceive it accurately, which explains why modern buildings often lack living structure.
supports
Alexander's explanation for the 'temperamental' nature of the principle: it can be overridden by human agency

Related by similarity (8)

cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edge

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

The shapes of a truly living architecture can only be of this unfolded nature, created step by step dynamically, both in conception and construction.claim0.825
Universal claim about all living architecture.
It is my contention that the shapes of a truly living architecture… can only be of this nature. They must have been created step by step—dynamically—both while they were being thought out and while they were being made.quote0.819
Key normative claim about the geometric requirement for living architecture.
Buildings made with an eye to the past will most often fail to have living structure, because the process of historical reproduction somehow turns vivid, living structure sour.claim0.815
Argues that copying historical forms does not produce living structure.
The profound wholeness of living structure, almost every time it has been done most profoundly, has been done in a mystical‑religious context.claim0.801
A sweeping historical observation that grounds the claim that mystical context is a near‑universal condition for the highest living structure.
The deepest living structure in buildings is not attainable without some new understanding, without a new faith based on a new physical and intellectual grasp of the nature of the material universe.claim0.799
A strong conditional: the creation of the highest living structure requires a cosmology that reunites self and matter in terms consistent with modern science.
The goodness of the results is visible in the evident life and in the profound fact that unfolding generates an 'architecture'.claim0.797
The dual validation of living process: life and the emergence of architectural order.
The kind of order that occurs in living structure has a complexity not usually describable by drawings or by architectural images.claim0.795
Emphasizes the non-pictorial, process-dependent nature of living order.
The creation of living structure cannot be done in any other way.claim0.795