It is my contention that the shapes of a truly living architecture… can only be of this nature. They must have been created step by step—dynamically—both while they were being thought out and while they were being made.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The shapes of a truly living architecture can only be of this unfolded nature, created step by step dynamically, both in conception and construction.claim0.940
  Universal claim about all living architecture.
• The creation of living structure cannot be done in any other way.claim0.840
• To have living modern architecture, society must have a process capable of generating building form dynamically, step by step, at all scales.claim0.837
  The need for a new kind of process in society.
• Many modern designs could not, under any circumstances, have been created by a structure-preserving step-by-step process; they are conceptual and barren.claim0.832
  In-principle impossibility claim.
• Living structure in buildings can only be GENERATED. It cannot be created by brute force from designs.claim0.831
  Core thesis of Book 2, stated at the transition to Part Two.
• In modern architecture, neither design nor construction typically works step by step; instead there is a fixed end-state produced without realistic feedback.claim0.831
  Contrast between living process and current architectural practice.
• The beautiful shape of the bridge was actually generated, dynamically, during the process of construction.claim0.830
  Observation about the Golden Gate Bridge, supporting that process can generate form.
• If it is a living process, it will create beautiful geometric structure. If it does not create beautiful structure, it cannot truly be a living process.claim0.830
  Beauty and geometry are the talisman by which a living process is known.