The lack of unfolding in the Japanese building complex's ground floor and inclined planes shows that they simply appeared from a whim, not from sensible adaptation.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The forms of these buildings do not allow such an unfolding to occur; they patently do not.claim0.808
  Critique of Renzo Piano's and Daniel Libeskind's buildings as incapable of unfolding.
• Conceptual buildings, not based on an unfolding process, do not fit practical human needs and stand awkwardly unrelated to their surroundings.claim0.794
  Consequence of lack of unfolding.
• We hypothesize that it is possible to invent high-technology versions of smooth unfolding processes so buildings can be specified cheaply while being uniquely adapted to each conditionhypothesis0.786
  Alexander's programmatic hypothesis framing the 21st-century construction research agenda.
• The bank building's entrance, windows, and base were not unfolded from the site, rendering the building dysfunctional and ugly.claim0.780
  Further analysis of bank building.
• The more austere forms of buildings also arise from the wholeness that comes from buildings that are near rectangular, to make positive space.claim0.774
• The great majority of modern buildings are awkward assemblies of unrelated components, lacking the coherence necessary to be living designs.claim0.769
  Aesthetic judgment on modern buildings.
• It is the material substance of walls, floors, steps, windows, and roof — and the configuration of how they are made — which governs whether living centers can emerge and fine structure adaptation can occurclaim0.762
  Alexander's foundational claim linking material technique directly to the possibility of living architecture.
• What is the difference between those buildings generated by living process (unfolding and structure-preserving transformations) compared with those buildings created wilfully by arbitrary design moves?question0.761
  Second motivating question for the appendix.