claim
active
claim:the-correctness-of-programs-is-partly-defined-in-terms-of-proper-performance-of-the-speech-acts-answers-should-be-truthful-and-responsive-and-promises-should-be-kept-sentences-of-logic-expressing-these-forms-of-correctness-can-be-generated-automatically-from-the-form-of-the-programThe correctness of programs is partly defined in terms of proper performance of the speech acts. Answers should be truthful and responsive, and promises should be kept. Sentences of logic expressing these forms of correctness can be generated automatically from the form of the program.
Second abstract claim.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Distinction between illocutionary and perlocutionary correctness.
- Claim about automatic generation of logical correctness conditions.
- Claim about the nature of accomplishment verification.
- Claim about the difficulty of responsiveness verification.
- Key claim of the Algol 48/50 and Elephant approach.
- We hope that programs using performatives will be easier to write, understand, debug, modify and (above all) verify.hypothesis0.766Hope expressed about the benefits of Elephant-style programs.
- Definition of abstract performative, a core invention of the paper.