claim
active
claim:stating-and-proving-that-answers-to-questions-and-other-statements-are-responsive-seems-to-require-a-substantially-larger-logical-apparatus-than-merely-proving-that-the-answers-are-truthfulStating and proving that answers to questions and other statements are responsive seems to require a substantially larger logical apparatus than merely proving that the answers are truthful.
Claim about the difficulty of responsiveness verification.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- How can we formally specify and verify that answers to questions are responsive rather than merely truthful?question0.906Core problem requiring logical apparatus beyond simple truth conditions; McCarthy proposes solution using concept notation from McCarthy 1979b.
- Definition of responsiveness for verification purposes.
- About chain-of-thought and process safety.
- Universalist claim predicting cross-cultural generality.
- Second abstract claim.
- The capacity to be substantively rational and respond appropriately to reasons.
- From the West Dean experience: the north wall alone required approximately 500 such judgments.
- Claim that design decisions within a living process are not arbitrary but can be objectively correct.