claim
active
claim:terence-deacon-s-incomplete-nature-seems-not-to-have-understood-the-points-about-ratchets-and-multi-stability-or-perhaps-re-invented-them-with-extraordinarily-obscure-terminologyTerence Deacon's 'Incomplete Nature' seems not to have understood the points about ratchets and multi-stability, or perhaps re-invented them with extraordinarily obscure terminology.
Sloman's harsh criticism of Deacon's philosophy.
Source paper
extracted_fromNeighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Thinkers (1)
thinker
- Terence DeaconcontradictsAuthor of 'Incomplete Nature' (2011); Sloman notes apparent reinvention of ratchet/multi-stability concepts with obscure terminology.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Strong in-principle claim against modern icons.
- Sloman's broad methodological critique of philosophy of science.
- Encapsulates the distinction between natural and human-made order, central to Alexander's critique of contemporary architecture.
- Paper's refutation of philosophical zombie concept via functionalist analogy
- Central claim linking life's properties to the inherent competencies of its material substrate.
- Expresses the aspiration of the new production method to recover a natural quality of order.