claim
active
claim:much-of-what-is-written-by-philosophers-of-science-is-either-false-or-incomplete-because-they-do-not-take-account-of-the-implications-of-schrodinger-s-ideas-for-chemistry-and-biologyMuch of what is written by philosophers of science is either false or incomplete because they do not take account of the implications of Schrödinger's ideas for chemistry and biology.
Sloman's broad methodological critique of philosophy of science.
Source paper
extracted_fromNeighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Sloman's extension of Schrödinger's argument to brain mechanisms and virtual machinery.
- Sloman's endorsement that quantum stability is a necessary condition for life.
- Load-bearing epistemological statement; Schrödinger argues that current ignorance does not imply impossibility—motivates search for deeper theory.
- Historical priority claim regarding information theory.
- Blames modern education and design culture for losing the ability to generate living environments.
- Central thesis of the paper — the framing premise from which all other arguments follow
- Observation of Alexander's pattern of self-rejection.