Subjectively, there can be no evidence for a self separate from the world.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• no subjective evidence for a self separate from the worldconcept0.950
  The subjective consequence of the formal impossibility: a separate self cannot be empirically evidenced.
• no evidence for a self separate from the world.quote0.935
  Key takeaway from the argument.
• There is no self-evidencequote0.844
  Title of the paper, encapsulating its central claim.
• The making of a living world cannot be separated from each person's search for the true self.claim0.826
  The enigmatic conclusion that the most personal, inward search yields the most public, functional harmony.
• The impossibility of self-evidence extends to any boundary the agent might posit, not only the self-environment boundaryclaim0.816
  Generalises the core result via Corollary 3.2 of Fields & Glazebrook (2023) to ground Buddhist teaching that all dharmas are empty
• Self-inquiry and non-self are not contradictory—experience exists without a fixed experiencer.claim0.804
• We may then arrive at a picture of the world which includes the self, and which clearly recognizes the personal nature of the universe.claim0.786
  The outcome of using both methods together.
• "no proof by means of direct perception, no proof by means of inference [establishes a self independent from the aggregates]"quote0.783
  Vasubandhu's argument against the existence of an independent self in Abhidharmakośa-bhāṣya.