claim
active
claim:philosophical-debates-about-the-relationship-between-phenomenal-consciousness-and-moral-standing-need-to-engage-with-neglected-questions-about-the-nature-of-autonomy-and-its-possible-links-to-consciousnessPhilosophical debates about the relationship between phenomenal consciousness and moral standing need to engage with neglected questions about the nature of autonomy and its possible links to consciousness.
Call for philosophical attention to autonomy-consciousness links.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Questions (1)
question
- Question linking the possibility of non-welfare autonomous beings to the consciousness debate.
Artifacts (1)
artifact
- The working paper itself, presenting a pluralist theory of moral standing and arguing that autonomy can ground moral standing without welfare subjectivity.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Tentative conclusion on the autonomy-consciousness link.
- Exploratory question in section 5.
- Personal justification (and thus epistemic rationality) requires phenomenal consciousness.claim0.800A route to showing autonomy may entail consciousness.
- Normative premise of the consciousness route.
- Load-bearing epistemic caution the author places on the entire analytical framework.
- Central question motivating the paper.
- Load-bearing conclusion: generalized sentience frameworks are essential for ethical and survival-level reasons.