Neither AIs nor humans should be considered autonomous and self-sufficient loops in the world.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• AI should be understood as a companion and constituent participant in collective stress-care loops, not a mere tool.claim0.800
• Many recent discussions of AI, and its impact on individuals and on society, are importantly incomplete because they neglect Diverse Intelligence, synthetic morphology, and developmental biology.claim0.791
  Central thesis of the paper — the framing premise from which all other arguments follow
• our analysis suggests that no current AI systems are conscious, but also suggests that there are no obvious technical barriers to building AI systems which satisfy these indicators.quote0.791
  Key takeaway from abstract, amended version.
• AI systems which possess more of the indicator properties are more likely to be conscious.claim0.781
  Graded claim about the rubric.
• No current AI systems are conscious.claim0.779
  Overall assessment of current state; qualified by possibility.
• AI systems need to be able to deal with reality as it actually is, not with the way that we think it is.claim0.776
  Paraphrase of Cantwell Smith's argument; aligns with Buddhist emphasis on seeing reality without conceptual imposition.
• In this loop, humans and technology both contribute as agents, and their capacity for care and intelligence can be observed and tracked by focusing on the transfers of their stresses.quote0.769
  Describes the dual SCI loop perspective.
• AI can be seen to display care of its own, and is hence not a mere tool for the expression of human care.claim0.768
  Ethical conclusion about the status of AI.