claim
active
claim:memory-evolutive-systems-currently-use-externally-parametrized-dynamics-rather-than-endogenous-self-referential-time-so-the-approach-remains-outside-the-constitutive-dynamic-it-describesMemory Evolutive Systems currently use externally parametrized dynamics rather than endogenous, self-referential time, so the approach remains outside the constitutive dynamic it describes.
Critical assessment of MES/WLIMES as a formal tool.
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Samson Abramsky · Wolfgang Banzhaf · Leo S. D. Caves · Michael Levin +4
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Frameworks (1)
framework
- Category-theoretic hierarchical framework allowing metamodels to evolve via 'complexification'.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Foundational claim of the paper, defining self-evidencing.
- Memory transfer across tissues and through metamorphosis supports persistence of Self.
- The paper's claim that theoretical convergence across GWT, RPT, HOT, IIT makes the findings non-coincidental
- Addresses the concern that emptiness realisation might undermine adaptive functioning
- Links ETIs to the learning of hierarchical representations.
- Core hypothesis linking developmental robustness to memory remapping.
- Concrete proposal about necessary architecture for ETIs.
- Claims that scale-free dynamics, like bioelectric networks, are ancient and conserved.