In the 20th century there were violent taboos in the architectural community against building anything from C_living.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• After 1900, a variety of modern building processes came into use that are not structure-preserving—some accidentally structure-destroying, others actively promoting ugliness for profit.claim0.789
  Historical shift.
• This process is harmful, and has a strong tendency to work against creation of living structure in building design.claim0.774
• Most present-day architects like talking about construction but are afraid of construction tools, and architectural education prevents students from gaining construction experience.claim0.771
  Observation about the culture of architecture that perpetuates the separation of design from making.
• The buildings of C_living form a visually recognizable class.claim0.767
• In the 20th century there has been something almost like a taboo against seeing the I, or true beauty, or God.claim0.766
  Historical diagnosis: modern architects and designers systematically avoided true beauty because it struck a nerve they could not tolerate.
• Professional architecture of the 20th century has paid too little attention to the complex, subtle structure that only living processes create, leading to environments that rob millions of common sense.claim0.763
  Critique of mainstream architectural practice as detrimental to human wholeness.
• The question of life threatens modern architecture because its examples have less life.claim0.760
  Interpretation of student discomfort as defense of contemporary architectural norms.
• In the 20th century, images became divorced from reality; photographs of buildings in magazines became more important than the actual buildings themselves.claim0.760
  Role of media images.