In the 20th century, images became divorced from reality; photographs of buildings in magazines became more important than the actual buildings themselves.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• After 1900, a variety of modern building processes came into use that are not structure-preserving—some accidentally structure-destroying, others actively promoting ugliness for profit.claim0.802
  Historical shift.
• Buildings of recent decades (1940-90) are noticeably missing in these fifteen properties, and this is intentional due to 20th-century architectural theoriesclaim0.797
  Historical-critical claim that modern architecture consciously abandoned understanding and use of the fifteen properties, making contemporary buildings poor illustrations of living structure
• Professional architecture of the 20th century has paid too little attention to the complex, subtle structure that only living processes create, leading to environments that rob millions of common sense.claim0.785
  Critique of mainstream architectural practice as detrimental to human wholeness.
• The image-conscious high-style architecture served as justification for mass-produced commercial buildings that also lacked unfolding due to industrial procedures.claim0.783
  Connection between high style and mass production.
• The great majority of modern buildings are awkward assemblies of unrelated components, lacking the coherence necessary to be living designs.claim0.778
  Aesthetic judgment on modern buildings.
• Buildings made with an eye to the past will most often fail to have living structure, because the process of historical reproduction somehow turns vivid, living structure sour.claim0.774
  Argues that copying historical forms does not produce living structure.
• The processes needed to create life were damaged in the 20th century.claim0.771
  Explains why profound life is less common in modern buildings.
• In the late 20th century, architectural judgment had been turned on its head by prevailing dogma, requiring a formal observational method as antidoteclaim0.769
  Historical claim explaining why a formal methodology is needed to counter deliberate perversion of commonsense architectural values