Buildings of recent decades (1940-90) are noticeably missing in these fifteen properties, and this is intentional due to 20th-century architectural theories

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The great majority of modern buildings are awkward assemblies of unrelated components, lacking the coherence necessary to be living designs.claim0.803
  Aesthetic judgment on modern buildings.
• Professional architecture of the 20th century has paid too little attention to the complex, subtle structure that only living processes create, leading to environments that rob millions of common sense.claim0.799
  Critique of mainstream architectural practice as detrimental to human wholeness.
• In the 20th century, images became divorced from reality; photographs of buildings in magazines became more important than the actual buildings themselves.claim0.797
  Role of media images.
• After 1900, a variety of modern building processes came into use that are not structure-preserving—some accidentally structure-destroying, others actively promoting ugliness for profit.claim0.797
  Historical shift.
• Buildings made with an eye to the past will most often fail to have living structure, because the process of historical reproduction somehow turns vivid, living structure sour.claim0.794
  Argues that copying historical forms does not produce living structure.
• This is the moment when the building becomes architecture.claim0.779
  The brutal geometric moment — making positive elements, syncopated harmony, massive stones — is what transforms mere building into architecture
• The existence of widely agreed‑upon lists of great buildings suggests a shared perception of life in buildings.claim0.777
  Argues for intersubjective agreement about the quality of life.
• The architecture of the past century served the inherently machine-like production process that is incapable of creating life.claim0.767
  General historical verdict.