Each new building will be a good neighbor.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• This is the moment when the building becomes architecture.claim0.788
  The brutal geometric moment — making positive elements, syncopated harmony, massive stones — is what transforms mere building into architecture
• Given two versions of a building, A and B, can we tell empirically which one has more life, in a way which allows people to reach agreement — that is to say, objectively?question0.769
  Opening question of the chapter that the entire methodological argument is designed to answer
• To bring life to the neighborhood, it is essential that it can be a place where people live and work.claim0.764
  Asserts the necessity of mixed-use for urban vitality.
• To treat the gardens as positive — more positive, even, than the buildings themselves — that is the first step.claim0.761
  The inversion of typical priority: garden space should be shaped as strongly as (or stronger than) buildings.
• To learn how to create living structure in buildings, we had better start by looking at nature.quote0.760
  Alexander's programmatic statement linking his natural philosophy to his architectural agenda
• Under these conditions, what is done next always has a natural and comfortable relation to what existed before: it has a similar structure and never violates the previously existing structure.claim0.759
  Characteristic of a structure-preserving process.
• No building is ever really complete – inhabitants' requirements change, environment changes. Repair should lose sense of 'incorrectness' and become redesign opportunity.concept0.758
  Alexander's foundational insight about iterative system improvement that motivates the piecemeal growth approach.
• Each building enlivens and intensifies the land.claim0.758
  The land—its valleys, ridges, trees, paths—are improved, made more solid, given a more living structure by a well-placed building.