All wholeness, not just color, may be considered ultimately as a kind of light, communicating with the transcendent realm where pure unity exists.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The wholeness of geometry is intensified and brought to its maximum potential by inner light in color.claim0.842
• Inner light cannot be achieved without geometric wholeness (field of centers) present; color depends on geometry.claim0.837
• The wholeness is a real structure, something geometrically concrete, not merely a general appreciation for unity.claim0.833
  Assertion that wholeness is a tangible spatial structure.
• Color is an essential feature of reality; the unity of things (like a forest) is colored, not just structural.claim0.828
• To see wholeness as it is requires purity of mind, because thoughts, mental constructs, theories, ideas, and images all interfere with perception of wholeness and make it difficult to see.claim0.825
  A cognitive‑perceptual explanation drawn from the earlier HUGGINS & ALEXANDER experiment.
• Wholeness is a neutral structure that simply exists; its degree of life or beauty follows from its internal cohesion without reference to opinion.claim0.822
  Posits that wholeness provides an objective foundation for aesthetics.
• Almost every person experiences the making of wholeness, like food.claim0.816
  Generalization from personal and student experience.
• The rule of hierarchy of color areas is almost universally followed in things with inner light; equal areas of several colors almost never occur in such works.claim0.816