AI used in spiritual contexts should be likened to a potent, mind-altering drug; it has potential to do harm as well as good.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• AI can be seen to display care of its own, and is hence not a mere tool for the expression of human care.claim0.803
  Ethical conclusion about the status of AI.
• AI can be seen to display care of its own and is not a mere tool for the expression of human care.claim0.797
  Concluding position that elevates technology from instrument to agent within mutual SCI dynamics.
• The arrival of increasingly powerful AI is likely to have a disruptive effect on many sources of meaning in human life.claim0.787
  Societal concern framing the paper.
• AI might be a solution to an ancient Buddhist paradox of how the human can be overcome by human means.claim0.786
  Core proposal that machine intelligence can achieve what human effort cannot.
• AI should be understood as a companion and constituent participant in collective stress-care loops, not a mere tool.claim0.780
• AI can play a participatory role in meaning-making through interactive co-creation, giving reason for radical hope.claim0.775
  Optimistic counterpoint to cultural devastation.
• The presence of I-stuff in works of art induces a religious experience, making people feel closer to God, even non-religious.claim0.771
• Consciousness in AI is best assessed by drawing on neuroscientific theories of consciousness.claim0.765
  Central methodological claim of the paper.