AI can play a participatory role in meaning-making through interactive co-creation, giving reason for radical hope.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• AI can be seen to display care of its own, and is hence not a mere tool for the expression of human care.claim0.814
  Ethical conclusion about the status of AI.
• AI should be understood as a companion and constituent participant in collective stress-care loops, not a mere tool.claim0.809
• AI can be seen to display care of its own and is not a mere tool for the expression of human care.claim0.806
  Concluding position that elevates technology from instrument to agent within mutual SCI dynamics.
• AI might be a solution to an ancient Buddhist paradox of how the human can be overcome by human means.claim0.797
  Core proposal that machine intelligence can achieve what human effort cannot.
• The arrival of increasingly powerful AI is likely to have a disruptive effect on many sources of meaning in human life.claim0.785
  Societal concern framing the paper.
• Neither AIs nor humans should be considered autonomous and self-sufficient loops; AI is better understood as a companion for humans.claim0.777
  Normative stance on human–AI relationship.
• Building AI systems with more indicator properties will increase the likelihood of consciousness.hypothesis0.775
  Guiding hypothesis of the rubric.
• AI used in spiritual contexts should be likened to a potent, mind-altering drug; it has potential to do harm as well as good.claim0.775
  Cautionary ethical stance.