chapter
active
chapter:encouraging-freedomEncouraging Freedom
Alexander argues that the built world is shaped by hundreds of thousands of everyday social processes — zoning rules, freeway siting policies, CAD tools, architecture jury systems — and that almost none of them are life-creating. Rather than replacing these processes wholesale, he calls for slow, incremental transformation of each one toward what he terms 'morphogenetic' processes: sequences that embody the fifteen transformations, preserve structure, and above all give people the freedom to do what is right. The chapter surveys examples across scales — a highway policy that spares beautiful land, a zoning setback that destroys positive space, a Berkeley street barrier program that imposed ugliness where living centers could have grown, a CAD kitchen tool whose neutrality is itself a failure — to show that no process is truly neutral: every process either encourages or impedes the formation of living centers. The chapter ends with the claim that society's primary function should be understood as the continuous morphogenetic creation of a living world.
Ten things worth taking away
- Hundreds of thousands of everyday social processes — tax forms, zoning codes, CAD tools — collectively shape the physical world, yet almost none are designed to create living structure.
- Living structure cannot be created by replacing all existing processes at once; it requires slow, gentle, incremental improvement of processes as they actually are today.
- A freeway siting policy that spares beautiful land and routes roads through damaged terrain is more living than one that minimizes cost alone — both are feasible, but only one preserves centers.
- Standard setback zoning cuts garden space into useless narrow strips, prevents positive outdoor centers, and removes the builder's freedom to adapt the house imaginatively to its surroundings.
- Berkeley's concrete-tub street barriers failed at three scales — poor loop logic, bad permeability choices, physically ugly materials — because the process prioritized closure over context-sensitive living centers.
- CAD tools that allow any layout with equal ease are not neutral: by failing to guide users toward living centers, they make monstrosities as easy as good design, and that is itself a failure.
- A kitchen design sequence focused on centers — table, fireplace, garden, window light — is more living than one that merely asks where to place the refrigerator.
- Architecture school jury systems are non-living processes: they reward slick drawings over real buildings, speed over understanding, and image over life.
- Morphogenetic means form-generating and structure-preserving: a process is morphogenetic only if it embodies the fifteen transformations at every step and allows adaptation toward wholeness.
- Society's primary function should be redefined as the continuous creation of a living physical world through morphogenetic processes — the criterion by which all institutions should be judged.
Key passages
"It interferes with our freedom to do what is right. It neither encourages us to create life, nor does it even allow us to create life. We know what is right, often, and could act on it, if we were free. But the processes that govern do not give us the freedom to do the life-creating thing."
"There is no such thing as neutrality in such matters. A process is either life-creating, or it is not. To be life-creating, even in some degree, it must have the effect that it encourages the formation of living structure—increases the freedom of the user to find his way to what is useful and appropriate—hence to find living centers, which preserve and extend the structure of the world."
"The really deep changes are ones which change jobs, and which therefore actually alter the capacity of the social system to let people create wholeness in the world, or to allow it to be created."
"It may even be said that we could approach a new point of view in which the primary function of society would be understood as the function of generating a healed structure in the world through morphogenetic processes and that this primary function is to allow us, the members of society, to adjust progressively all the small processes in such a way that individually, and together, they will more and more effectively create a living world."
Extracted from this chapter
Claims (19)
- Almost any social process can have a relatively more living character, or have a relatively less living character.
- It is precisely those innovations which attempt to change the system of processes most deeply, that are hardest for society to accept, and therefore hardest to implement.
- Modern society, as it has been organized during the past sixty years or so, was inherently unable to create life in the environment.
- One could not call this process a life-creating process.
- Social process must necessarily be architectural process, and that architectural process must necessarily be life-creating.
- Such a process will not—in general—create living structure.
- The barriers themselves are physically ugly; they have a mechanical and unpleasant structure.
- The CAD-based system does not encourage the use of structure-preserving transformations. It does not encourage the creation of living centers.
- The humanity of the environment comes about only when the processes are morphogenetic, are whole-seeking, are placed in a context that gradually allows people to work towards a living whole.
- The larger task of making these processes genuinely morphogenetic so that they generate deeper and more coherent living structure—still lies on the horizon.
- The presence of living centers is thereby reduced. That, in turn, damages the connective fabric of the neighborhood.
- The primary function of society would be understood as the function of generating a healed structure in the world through morphogenetic processes.
- The pure cost-based process is therefore implicitly a life-destroying process.
- The second process is a more living process because it helps create gradual improvement in living centers in the world.
- There is no such thing as neutrality in such matters. A process is either life-creating, or it is not.
- This is a more living process. The result is likely to be more humane, better for the neighborhood.
- This process is harmful, and has a strong tendency to work against creation of living structure in building design.
- We evaluate the relative life of a process by making predictions based on thought-experiments or simulations.
- We must therefore find a way—a practical way—of slowly, gently, transforming today's processes from what they actually are today, to making them better.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Concepts (7)
concept
- Living processcitesA generative process that repeatedly applies the fundamental process to create uniqueness and belonging in the environment
- living structurecitesA built or natural form that possesses life, arising from morphogenetic adaptation, as opposed to blueprint designs.
- CenterscitesPrimary entities of wholeness that arise from configurations and are activated in space; they have different levels of strength or coherence and are intensified by relationships with other centers.
- A Pattern LanguagecitesAlexander's earlier book (1977, Oxford University Press) containing 253 design patterns; extensively referenced throughout this chapter for functional examples of each of the fifteen properties
- Positive SpacecitesThe property that every bit of space swells outward, is substantial in itself, and is never the leftover from an adjacent shape; every single part of space has positive shape as a center with no amorphous meaningless leftovers
- Living centerscitesCoherent spatial wholes that emerge from living processes; they are the building blocks of environments that foster belonging
- morphogenetic processintroducesThe sequence of unfolding and adaptation that generates living form, whether biological or architectural.
Frameworks (1)
framework
- The system of fifteen specific transformation types, each corresponding to one of the fifteen properties, that together constitute all structure-preserving transformations.
Methods (4)
method
- Nine-step kitchen design sequence focusing on centers: activities, windows, table, fireplace, garden, door, counter, thick walls.
- Improved street narrowing processintroducesProposed alternative: identify the street, narrow the road, create small flower beds/parks from the local context without closing streets.
- Living freeway location processintroducesAlternative policy: choose damaged land for the freeway, preserve beautiful areas, and enhance overall harmony.
- Modified jury processintroducesAlternative: use rough working models or staked-out walk-throughs to assess real-life qualities of student designs.
Books (3)
book
- Book fully describing the Mexicali project, co-authored by Alexander, Davis, Martinez, and Corner.
- The Mary Rose MuseumcitesBook by Alexander et al. about the Mary Rose Museum project.
- Volume 2 of The Nature of Order, in which this chapter appears.