There is no such thing as neutrality in such matters. A process is either life-creating, or it is not.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• One could not call this process a life-creating process.claim0.835
• When the process is correct, the creation of life follows almost automatically, without effort.claim0.832
• A living process is always natural, similar to the best kind of natural process, but it goes deeper and includes additional centers that naive natural process may miss.claim0.828
  Positions living process as an refined version of innate human creativity, not an artificial imposition.
• The issue is not whether the process will produce living structure if done faithfully — it will — but whether the maker has the stamina and will to keep rejecting versions that lack life.claim0.817
  Alexander's claim that the limiting factor in creating living structure is not method but the maker's persistence.
• The process itself is to be part of nature.claim0.811
• A living process always creates something unique at every point, respecting the uniqueness of every person and every place.claim0.808
• The fact that one process calls on other processes is not voluntary; it is essential to the nature of the system, just as in arithmetic.claim0.807
  Argues that sequence linkages reflect deep necessity, not option, for the system to work.
• The structures where life occurs just cannot be made in any other way.quote0.807
  Categorical assertion about the necessity of the living process.