paper:doi-10-48550-arxiv-2201-08239LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications
Original abstract (expand)
We present LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications. LaMDA is a family of Transformer-based neural language models specialized for dialog, which have up to 137B parameters and are pre-trained on 1.56T words of public dialog data and web text. While model scaling alone can improve quality, it shows less improvements on safety and factual grounding. We demonstrate that fine-tuning with annotated data and enabling the model to consult external knowledge sources can lead to significant improvements towards the two key challenges of safety and factual grounding. The first challenge, safety, involves ensuring that the model's responses are consistent with a set of human values, such as preventing harmful suggestions and unfair bias. We quantify safety using a metric based on an illustrative set of human values, and we find that filtering candidate responses using a LaMDA classifier fine-tuned with a small amount of crowdworker-annotated data offers a promising approach to improving model safety. The second challenge, factual grounding, involves enabling the model to consult external knowledge sources, such as an information retrieval system, a language translator, and a calculator. We quantify factuality using a groundedness metric, and we find that our approach enables the model to generate responses grounded in known sources, rather than responses that merely sound plausible. Finally, we explore the use of LaMDA in the domains of education and content recommendations, and analyze their helpfulness and role consistency.
Related work— refs + corpus + external arXiv
Cited / in-corpus / arXiv badges show which signals surfaced each row. Multi-source rows weighted higher.
- SDialog: A Python Toolkit for End-to-End Agent Building, User Simulation, Dialog Generation, and EvaluationS\'everin Baroudi, Yanis Labrak, David Grunert, Pawel Cyrta, Yiyang Chen, Srikanth Madikeri, Thomas Schaaf, Esa\'u Villatoro-Tello, Ahmed Hassoon, Ricard Marxer, Petr Motlicek Sergio Burdisso2026≈ 73%
- A Survey of Large Language ModelsKun Zhou, Junyi Li, Tianyi Tang, Xiaolei Wang, Yupeng Hou, Yingqian Min, Beichen Zhang, Junjie Zhang, Zican Dong, Yifan Du, Chen Yang, Yushuo Chen, Zhipeng Chen, Jinhao Jiang, Ruiyang Ren, Yifan Li, Xinyu Tang, Zikang Liu, Peiyu Liu, Jian-Yun Nie and Ji-Rong Wen Wayne Xin Zhao2026≈ 72%
- ≈ 72%
- SDialog: A Python Toolkit for End-to-End Agent Building, User Simulation, Dialog Generation, and EvaluationS\'everin Baroudi, Yanis Labrak, David Grunert, Pawel Cyrta, Yiyang Chen, Srikanth Madikeri, Esa\'u Villatoro-Tello, Thomas Schaaf, Ricard Marxer, Petr Motlicek Sergio Burdisso2025≈ 71%
- RLang: A Declarative Language for Describing Partial World Knowledge to Reinforcement Learning AgentsBenjamin A. Spiegel, Jennifer Wang, Roma Patel, Stefanie Tellex and George Konidaris Rafael Rodriguez-Sanchez2023≈ 71%
- LLMs-Healthcare : Current Applications and Challenges of Large Language Models in various Medical SpecialtiesAwais Ahmed, Summaya Mumtaz Ummara Mumtaz2026≈ 71%
- Across the Levels of Analysis: Explaining Predictive Processing in Humans Requires More Than Machine-Estimated ProbabilitiesSathvik Nair and Colin Phillips2026≈ 71%
- astra-langchain4j: Experiences Combining LLMs and Agent ProgrammingKatharine Beaumont, Andrei Ciortea Rem Collier2026≈ 71%
- Vision-Language-Action (VLA) Models: Concepts, Progress, Applications and ChallengesYang Cao, Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Manoj Karkee Ranjan Sapkota2026≈ 71%
- A Survey on Mechanistic Interpretability for Multi-Modal Foundation ModelsSamyadeep Basu, Mohammad Beigi, Varun Manjunatha, Ryan A. Rossi, Zichao Wang, Yufan Zhou, Sriram Balasubramanian, Arman Zarei, Keivan Rezaei, Ying Shen, Barry Menglong Yao, Zhiyang Xu, Qin Liu, Yuxiang Zhang, Yan Sun, Shilong Liu, Li Shen, Hongxuan Li, Soheil Feizi, Lifu Huang Zihao Lin2025≈ 71%
- Advances in LLMs with Focus on Reasoning, Adaptability, Efficiency and EthicsMuhammad Zaeem Khan, Aleesha Zainab, Saleha Jamshed, Sadia Ahmad, Kaynat Khatib, Faria Bibi, and Abdul Rehman Asifullah Khan2026≈ 71%
- From Large AI Models to Agentic AI: A Tutorial on Future Intelligent CommunicationsCunhua Pan, Li Dong, Kezhi Wang, Octavia A. Dobre, and Merouane Debbah Feibo Jiang2025≈ 70%
- Evaluating Language Model Agency through NegotiationsVeniamin Veselovsky, Martin Josifoski, Maxime Peyrard, Antoine Bosselut, Michal Kosinski, Robert West Tim R. Davidson2026≈ 70%
- ≈ 70%
- Learning to Model the World with LanguageYuqing Du, Olivia Watkins, Danijar Hafner, Pieter Abbeel, Dan Klein, Anca Dragan Jessy Lin2024≈ 70%
- Interpreting Language Model Parametersin corpus2026≈ 69%
- ≈ 67%
- ≈ 66%
- ≈ 66%
- ≈ 66%
- Linda in contextin corpus1989≈ 65%
- ≈ 65%
- ≈ 65%
- Anima Labs Phenomenology Pt1in corpus≈ 65%
- Denotational Design: from meanings to programsin corpus2015≈ 64%
- Genuinely Functional User Interfacesin corpus≈ 64%
- ≈ 64%
- Mechanistic Knobs in LLMs: Retrieving and Steering High-Order Semantic Features via Sparse Autoencodersin corpus2026≈ 64%
- Opening the Hood of a Word Processorin corpus1984≈ 64%
Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar
Cited by (4)
- Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness
No current AI system is a strong candidate for phenomenal consciousness, yet there are no obvious technical barriers to building one — this is the central finding of Butlin et al. (2023), a systematic
- CAT'S THEORY: Empirical Validation and Architectural Applications Cross-Architecture AI Consciousness Recognition and the Foundation for Constraint-Preserving Recursive Intelligence
Constitutional AI (CAI) demonstrates that a harmless, non-evasive AI assistant can be trained using zero human feedback labels for harmlessness, replacing them entirely with AI-generated feedback guid
- Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models
Incorporating visual features into chain-of-thought rationale generation—rather than answer generation alone—breaks the hallucination bottleneck that causes sub-100B language models to fail at multimo
- Generalizing frameworks for sentience beyond natural species
Criteria anchored to vertebrate neuroanatomy and verbal behavior — exemplified by the Smith & Boyd (1991) framework and the Turing Test — are structurally inadequate for the full space of possible sen