paper:doi-10-1016-j-pneurobio-2015-09-001Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control
Original abstract (expand)
We review a theory of homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control within the Active Inference framework. Our aim is to connect two research streams that are usually considered independently; namely, Active Inference and associative learning theories of animal behaviour. The former uses a probabilistic (Bayesian) formulation of perception and action, while the latter calls on multiple (Pavlovian, habitual, goal-directed) processes for homeostatic and behavioural control. We offer a synthesis these classical processes and cast them as successive hierarchical contextualisations of sensorimotor constructs, using the generative models that underpin Active Inference. This dissolves any apparent mechanistic distinction between the optimization processes that mediate classical control or learning. Furthermore, we generalize the scope of Active Inference by emphasizing interoceptive inference and homeostatic regulation. The ensuing homeostatic (or allostatic) perspective provides an intuitive explanation for how priors act as drives or goals to enslave action, and emphasises the embodied nature of inference.
Related work— refs + corpus + external arXiv
Cited / in-corpus / arXiv badges show which signals surfaced each row. Multi-source rows weighted higher.
- Active Inference or Control as Inference? A Unifying ViewAbraham Imohiosen, Jan Peters Joe Watson2020≈ 80%
- Active inference for action-unaware agentsKeisuke Suzuki, Ryota Kanai, Manuel Baltieri Filippo Torresan2025≈ 79%
- Deriving time-averaged active inference from control principlesJordan Theriault, Jan-Willem van de Meent, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Karen Quigley Eli Sennesh2022≈ 78%
- Active Inference in Robotics and Artificial Agents: Survey and ChallengesCristian Meo, Corrado Pezzato, Ajith Anil Meera, Mohamed Baioumy, Wataru Ohata, Alexander Tschantz, Beren Millidge, Martijn Wisse, Christopher L. Buckley, Jun Tani Pablo Lanillos2021≈ 78%
- Demonstrating the Continual Learning Capabilities and Practical Application of Discrete-Time Active InferenceRithvik Prakki2024≈ 77%
- ≈ 77%
- On the Relationship Between Active Inference and Control as InferenceAlexander Tschantz, Anil K Seth, Christopher L Buckley Beren Millidge2020≈ 77%
- Active inference: demystified and comparedPhilip J. Ball, Thomas Parr, Karl J. Friston Noor Sajid2021≈ 77%
- Modeling motor control in continuous-time Active Inference: a surveyFederico Maggiore, Antonella Maselli, Francesco Donnarumma, Domenico Maisto, Francesco Mannella, Ivilin Peev Stoianov and Giovanni Pezzulo Matteo Priorelli2024≈ 77%
- ≈ 76%
- Active Inference and Human--Computer InteractionJohn H. Williamson, Sebastian Stein Roderick Murray-Smith2024≈ 76%
- Learning Perception and Planning with Deep Active InferenceTim Verbelen, Johannes Nauta, Cedric De Boom and Bart Dhoedt Ozan \c{C}atal2020≈ 76%
- Surprise! Using Physiological Stress for Allostatic Regulation Under the Active Inference Framework [Pre-Print]Imran Khan and Robert Lowe2024≈ 76%
- Expanding the Active Inference Landscape: More Intrinsic Motivations in the Perception-Action LoopChristian Guckelsberger (2), Christoph Salge (3 and 4), Sim\'on C. Smith (4 and 5), Daniel Polani (4) ((1) Araya Inc., Tokyo, Japan, (2) Computational Creativity Group, Department of Computing, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK, (3) Game Innovation Lab, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, New York University, New York City, NY, USA, (4) Sepia Lab, Adaptive Systems Research Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, (5) Institute of Perception, Action and Behaviour, School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, UK) Martin Biehl (1)2018≈ 76%
- ≈ 76%
- Active inference: demystified and comparedin corpus2021≈ 74%
- ≈ 73%
- Active Inference: A Process Theoryin corpus2017≈ 72%
- ≈ 72%
- Active Inference, Curiosity and Insightin corpus2017≈ 68%
- ≈ 67%
- ≈ 66%
- ≈ 66%
- ≈ 66%
- Life as we know itin corpus2013≈ 65%
- ≈ 65%
- ≈ 65%
- ≈ 65%
- Mechanistic Knobs in LLMs: Retrieving and Steering High-Order Semantic Features via Sparse Autoencodersin corpus2026≈ 65%
- ≈ 64%
Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar
Cited by (5)
- Contemplative Agent
Embedding four Buddhist-derived axiomatic principles—mindfulness, emptiness, non-duality, and boundless care—into AI systems via a framework the paper terms the 'Wise World Model' produces measurable
- Developmental Bioelectricity: the cognitive glue enabling evolutionary scaling from physiology to mind
Developmental bioelectricity—the network of ion channels, gap junctions, and neurotransmitter-mediated Vmem (membrane potential) dynamics operating across all body cells, not just neurons—functions as
- Cellular signaling pathways as plastic, proto-cognitive systems: Implications for biomedicine
- The computational boundary of a 'self': developmental bioelectricity drives multicellularity and scale-free cognition
Scale-Free Cognition, the framework introduced here, proposes that any coherent Self is demarcated by a 'cognitive light cone'—a spatio-temporal boundary of events a system can measure, model, and att
- Active Inference: A Process Theory
A single variational principle—minimizing variational free energy via gradient descent on a Markov decision process (MDP) generative model—is sufficient to derive neuronal dynamics that reproduce, wit