quote
active
quote:what-i-am-proposing-is-that-these-observations-of-an-observer-s-inner-state-are-not-merely-a-reflection-of-a-person-s-attitude-or-psychology-but-can-actually-be-used-to-measure-something-real-about-the-external-world-itselfWhat I am proposing is that these observations of an observer's inner state are not merely a reflection of a person's attitude or psychology, but can actually be used to measure something real about the external world itself.
Alexander's most radical epistemological claim stated with maximum directness
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Alexander's most radical epistemological claim: phenomenological measurement belongs in physics, not just psychology
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- The epistemological question whose answer determines whether the second method belongs to psychology or physics
- Central claim of the chapter: what appears subjective (inner feeling) is actually an objective measuring instrument for external reality
- Concluding methodological claim of §9 linking the measurement technique to the empirical status of life as a world-property
- Core distinction between the two methods stated concisely
- Description of the new method's core.
- Anatomical goal states cannot be inferred from observation of stress states by an external observer.claim0.802Knowledge of morphogenetic goals is inaccessible to external observers; only interior to system itself.
- An empirical method that invites the observer to make distinctions based on inner feelings of wholeness, with a framework that guarantees consistency and objectivity.
- Asserts that functional outcomes are determined by the wholeness structure, not by abstract categories.