The environment is good, or bad, according to the degree that its thousands and thousands of centers are pictures of the self, what we might call 'beings'.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The environment is good, or bad, according to the degree that its thousands of centers are pictures of the self, i.e., beings.claim0.977
  The central practical conclusion of the chapter: the being-character is the criterion for life in the environment.
• The environment is pleasant, beautiful, humane and people can achieve a true sense of belonging and love for the places where they live.claim0.864
  Overall qualitative evaluation of the planned environment.
• The best environment for human life is one which gives people the maximum chance to be free, allowing each person to react appropriately.claim0.786
  Definition of optimal environment.
• The forms of environment we have learned to create in modern times have caused us to lose the sense of true connection to ourselves and our society.claim0.786
  Directly blames the design of modern space for severing self- and social connection
• The environment affects us, and it is perhaps through our rooms that it does it most.claim0.784
  Opening claim about the importance of room character.
• The impact of the geometry of the environment—its living or not-living structure—has a trace-like, catalytic effect on emotional, social, spiritual, and physical well-being.claim0.778
  Analogy to trace elements and enzymes.
• The single criterion of whether everything is made of beings correlates accurately with the presence of life in the environment.hypothesis0.776
  Testable hypothesis that the being-character is a reliable indicator of experienced life.
• The self-like character of the environment has a direct impact on us: it nourishes us, supports us, and provides freedom.claim0.772
  Mirror-of-the-self effect.