the city is not, cannot, and must not be a tree.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• "the city is not, cannot, and must not be a tree. The city is a receptacle for life."concept0.916
  Alexander's foundational argument from 'A City Is Not a Tree'; articulates his vision of overlapping, non-hierarchical structure.
• "[T]he city is not, cannot, and must not be a tree. The city is a receptacle for life."concept0.912
• "The city is a receptacle for life. If the receptacle severs the overlap of the strands of life within it, because it is a tree, it will be like a bowl full of razor blades on edge."concept0.783
  Alexander, 'A City Is Not a Tree' (1965); vivid articulation of why hierarchical structures harm urban life and relationships.
• According to present-day biological terminology, a city is not a living system.claim0.772
  A statement of current orthodoxy used to highlight the need for a broader definition.
• Each particle of the city needs to be individual, particular.claim0.766
  A moral and aesthetic imperative for city form rooted in the nature of living tissue
• How can we try to make a living system out of a region, or a city, or a building—even out of a garden—when, according to current scientific orthodoxy, these things are not living systems?question0.744
  Rhetorical question highlighting the intellectual obstacle the book must overcome.
• Above all, then, a building is an ornament.claim0.740
  Radical claim that the highest function of a building is to be an ornament in the profound sense.
• To be whole, a building must be 'lost' in its surroundings—not separate, but part and parcel of them.claim0.738
  Defines the paradoxical quality of a living whole in architecture.