Our goal is nothing less than a complete description of the universe we live in. ... a complete unified theory that would cover everything in the universe.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• We may then arrive at a picture of the world which includes the self, and which clearly recognizes the personal nature of the universe.claim0.781
  The outcome of using both methods together.
• It is the space which comes to life. All that we do, as architects, is then to arrange and rearrange this living space, in such a way as to intensify its life.claim0.778
  Synthetic statement that architecture is the art of awakening space.
• A realization of our own multiscale, nested architecture naturally leads to the conclusion that care needs to be extended to all sentient beings.claim0.774
  Extends ethical concern based on the collective nature of selves.
• should the universe be empty to reduce suffering, or is it best to fill it with the potential joy of consciousness in every possible embodiment — what fundamentally matters?question0.773
  Deepest cosmological question the paper raises, connecting AI ethics to fundamental questions of value
• There is nothing except the living structure of the world, and this living structure is all we need to reason with.claim0.772
  Radical assertion that function reduces to living structure, eliminating the need for external goals.
• "I shall achieve insight in order to care and provide for all beings, throughout space and time."concept0.768
• To create living structure we must find our own contemporary version of the I—a new vision of the universe in which meaning exists, relatedness and self have a primary place, and which is as real for us as God was in Mozart's heart.claim0.767
  The central challenge of the chapter: we need a new cosmology with the same existential weight as historical religion.
• Life as we know it would not have been possible in a universe composed of Newtonian point masses with mutual gravitational attraction.claim0.764
  Sloman's assertion about the explanatory failure of classical physics.