I don't follow AI alignment research in any depth, but I am noticing a striking disconnect between the concepts appearing in those discussions and recent advances in AI, especially GPT-3.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Humanity has never solved the alignment problem between generations of humans, so AI alignment debates are not novel — they reflect a perennial unresolved problem.claim0.812
  Deflates the novelty of AI alignment by pointing to its structural identity with intergenerational value transmission
• How Can We Ensure Alignment Between Artificial Intelligencequestion0.808
• AI alignmentconcept0.779
  Field within which this work has implications for evaluating alignment progress.
• Many recent discussions of AI, and its impact on individuals and on society, are importantly incomplete because they neglect Diverse Intelligence, synthetic morphology, and developmental biology.claim0.773
  Central thesis of the paper — the framing premise from which all other arguments follow
• AI Alignment and Safetyconcept0.771
  The broader domain for which ESR has dual implications: resistance to adversarial manipulation vs. interference with safety interventions
• Recent AI advances are revolutionary but far from recapitulating human-like cognitive abilities or consciousness.claim0.769
• A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment (Askell et al. 2021)concept0.768
  HHH training framework that Claude was trained with prior to experiments
• The existential concerns raised about AI — alignment, control, value drift, supplanting — are not new and are precisely the concerns humanity has always faced in having children.claim0.767
  Key rhetorical and philosophical argument establishing continuity between AI concerns and child-rearing