question

active

question:what-is-truly-the-ultimate-nature-of-matter

What is, truly, the ultimate nature of matter?

The central drumbeat question that Book 4 attempts to answer.

Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count

Claims (1)

claim

Matter itself is not a mechanism: It is a potentially soul-like materiality which is essentially what we call self.
gates
New cosmological assumption #7: the deepest claim about the nature of matter.

Related by similarity (8)

cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edge

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

There must be some relation between the ultimate nature of a living center and the nature of the I.hypothesis0.771
The hypothesis that the deepest aspect of centers is identical with the I-like presence.
Personal Nature of the Universeconcept0.762
The long-term implication of the second method: a scientific worldview that incorporates the self and recognizes the personal, relational character of existence
The ultimate criterion for whether something works in nature and in buildings depends on the extent to which it resembles the healthy human selfclaim0.760
Summarizes the post-Cartesian revolution in a single succinct criterion
What Is The Nature Of The Relationship Betweenquestion0.751
What Is The Nature Of The Boundary Betweenquestion0.750
It is the nature of matter itself which is at stake; our despair follows from the belief that matter is machinelike.claim0.749
The root problem is the conception of matter; architecture and meaning depend on transforming this conception.
Physical Materials, Shapes, and Phenomenaconcept0.749
What Is The Nature Of Self And Identityquestion0.748