What did it take to create the environment which could support this music, adequately?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Is it even possible for us to create such an atmosphere, and to create this loving, even when somber, relation of ourselves to our environment?question0.777
  Central practical question.
• It is a fiction that it is possible to make a blueprint of a piece of the environment and have it work.claim0.764
  The claim that complete pre‑specification cannot accommodate the adaptive complexity of living systems.
• Modern society, as it has been organized during the past sixty years or so, was inherently unable to create life in the environment.claim0.761
• The processes needed to create life were damaged in the 20th century.claim0.759
  Explains why profound life is less common in modern buildings.
• How then — realistically — in the modern world can we get the subtle fine detail of adaptation, variation, and harmony which makes every component slightly different, and yet do it at the break-neck speed of modern giant projects and in the colossal quantities required for the largest projects?question0.757
  The central practical question the chapter sets out to answer.
• When people think about what is needed to give them surroundings in which life can be lived, they CAN articulate itclaim0.755
  Optimistic statement about the latent capacity of ordinary people to express their deepest needs
• I believe it is a necessary state of mind, without which it is not possible to reach the purity of structure needed to create a living thing.claim0.745
  The indispensability of the gift-to-God intention for creating life in buildings.
• When environments are built by morphogenesis they will of their own accord become sustainable.claim0.745
  First key empirical proposition of the lecture: morphogenetic processes inherently produce sustainable outcomes without explicit technical mandates.