question
active
question:is-it-even-permissible-today-to-please-yourselfIs it even permissible, today, to please yourself?
Question raised by the bridge example about whether contemporary society allows genuine self-pleasing.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- The moral revaluation: what society treats as self-indulgence is actually the path to transcendence.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- The troubling consequence of true self-pleasing: it produces beauty so deep it reveals the divine, which makes modern people uncomfortable.
- From the West Dean experience: the north wall alone required approximately 500 such judgments.
- The most radical claim of the chapter: the subjective and the ethical are identical at the deepest level.
- If we can only learn how to please ourselves, that prescription by itself will always create living structure.hypothesis0.773The conditional claim that true self-pleasing is sufficient for generating living structure in all cases.
- The core prescription of the chapter: making what truly pleases you at the deepest level, which Alexander argues is the key to creating all living structure and the path to the I.
- Diagnosis of why living structure is absent from the world: a failure of emotional knowledge enforced by social and internal constraints.
- Alexander claims that true pleasing oneself is identical to the path intended by the greatest religious teachers.
- The central thesis of the chapter: pleasing yourself is the necessary and sufficient prescription for creating living structure.